Many of my friends think hiroshima was an unjustifiable atrocity my usual course in atom-bomb disputes is to refer the belligerent to donald kagan’s brilliant 1995 piece in commentary, “why . Necessary use of a-bombs yes, dropping the atomic bombs was necessary the offspring of a million american grandfathers would not be alive today if truman had decided to invade the island of japan anyone who thinks that the japanese people would not have fought to the death is kidding themselves. On the 70th anniversary of hiroshima-nagasaki, a new collection of us, japanese, and russian documents on the use of the atomic bomb and the end of world war ii. Necessary evil, also referred to as plane #91, was the name of boeing b-29-45-mo superfortress 44-86291, , participating in the atomic bomb attack on hiroshima on august 6, 1945 assigned to the 393d bomb squadron , 509th composite group , it was used as a camera plane to photograph the explosion and effects of the bomb, and to carry scientific observers. A huge expanse of ruins left by the explosion of the atomic bomb on aug 6, 1945 in hiroshima and even our ww ii military icons knew it and the end of world war ii—a morally important .
Dropping the atomic bomb: was it really necessary in 1945, the united states with help from canada, released a new force into unsuspecting japan which shocked the world. The biggest single turning point in modern history was the dropping of the atomic bomb at the end of the second world war, according to new research the a-bomb blast killed between 90,000 to . Army chief of staff general george marshall thought that even after using a-bombs on japan the invasion would still be necessary, anyway, as opposed to the belief that using atomic bombs on japan would make the mainland invasion unnecessary (david lilienthal, the journals of david e lilienthal, volume two, pg 198).
The united states felt it was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities or it would suffer more casualties not only could the lives of many soldiers . The american decision to drop atomic bombs on both hiroshima and nagasaki, in august of 1945, resulted in the death of several hundred thousand japanese military personnel and civilians. The atomic bomb accomplished truman's primary objective the attack on hiroshima finally convinced hirohito that the war must end, and his long-delayed conclusion was the decisive step in bringing about a japanese surrender. Yes, dropping atomic bombs on japan was a good thing matt vespa | we sort of lucked out since the japanese thought we had more atomic bombs—we didn’t nevertheless, they surrendered, and .
The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all no invasion was necessary the vice chairman of the us bombing survey paul nitze wrote: i concluded that even without the atomic bomb, japan was likely to surrender in a matter of months my own view was that japan would capitulate by november 1945. The first is the standard, “official” version — the second bomb was necessary to prove that the united states could manufacture atomic weapons in quantity that is, the first atomic bomb proved it could be done, the second proved it wasn’t just a one-time thing. The atomic bomb was a neccessary horror japan was prepared to keep fighting, prepared to accept massive amounts of military casualties knowing that the loss of personnel among the allies would be equal in number. Bomb supporters argue that, although this destruction is distasteful by post-war sensibilities, it had become the norm long before president truman took office, and the atomic bomb was just one more weapon in the arsenal to be employed under this policy. The atomic bomb is indeed a fearsome weapon, but it was not the cause of japan's surrender, even though the myth persists even to this day in a trenchant new book, the decision to drop the atomic bomb (praeger, 1996), historian dennis d wainstock concludes that the bombings were not only unnecessary, but were based on a vengeful policy that actually harmed american interests.
Thus, as grave a military action as is an air bombardment, whether with the usual bombs or by atomic bomb, the one and only purpose of the bombing is to effect the surrender of the bombed nation the people of that nation, through their representatives, may surrender and, with the surrender, the bombing ceases, the killing is ended. Clearly, the issue of the bomb is still an important story and will be with us for some time walker references a 1999 poll by newseum, a museum of the news media, of sixty-seven american journalists who ranked the atomic bombing of japan in 1945 at the top of all the news stories of the twentieth century. The atomic bomb, and nuclear bombs, are powerful weapons that use nuclear reactions as their source of explosive energy scientists first developed nuclear weapons technology during world war ii.
The second atomic weapon used against japan, this single bomb resulted in the deaths of 80,000 japanese citizens for truman, the choice whether or not to use the atomic bomb was the most difficult decision of his life. Atomic bomb: atomic bomb, an important aid in achieving criticality is the use of a first atomic bombs the first atomic bomb was detonated on july 16, 1945 .
The atomic bombs were not necessary because no one knew the ramification of dropping the atomic bombs would be if the us government knew the ramification of the atomic bombs then that would reflect badly on the us. This was necessary to stop any plans the japanese had about bringing the war to united states soil in a political manner, the use of the atomic bomb put an end to . Was the us right to drop the atomic bombs upon hiroshima and nagasaki in my opinion, the united states decision to utilize the atomic bomb was sad, yet necessary . World war ii term papers (paper 1522) on atomic bomb: was it necessary: atomic bomb were the atomic bombings in hiroshima and nagasaki necessary to save allied lives and to end japan's threat to world peace.